Spotting Health Quackery
When health claims sound too good to be true, they usually are. Here's how to spot the warning signs.
The Placebo Effect Is Real
Before dismissing everything, understand that placebos actually work through real mechanisms[1]—they cause measurable physical changes.
Placeboⓘ
Noceboⓘ
Healthcare professionals across Europe recognize placebo and nocebo effects[4].
Key insight: Feeling better after a treatment doesn't prove the treatment works. Placebo effects, natural recovery, and regression to the mean can all create the illusion of effectiveness.
Red Flags for Quackery
### 1. Miracle Cure Claims
Watch for:
- "Cures everything"
- "100% effective"
- "Guaranteed results"
- "Works for everyone"
Real medicine acknowledges limitations. Nothing works for everyone. Real treatments have known failure rates and side effects.
### 2. "Ancient Wisdom" or "Natural" Appeal
Natural fallacyⓘ
"Ancient wisdom" is also suspect—our ancestors also believed in bloodletting, trepanning, and mercury cures. Age doesn't equal validity.
### 3. Conspiracy Thinking
Classic quackery claims:
- "Doctors don't want you to know"
- "Big Pharma is hiding the cure"
- "Suppressed by the medical establishment"
If something actually worked, the "conspiracy" would need to include millions of doctors, researchers, and regulators worldwide—including in countries with no stake in Western pharmaceutical profits.
### 4. Testimonials Instead of Evidence
Personal stories are psychologically compelling but scientifically weak[6].
Why testimonials aren't evidence:
- Survivorship bias: You only hear from people who felt helped
- Placebo effect: Feeling better doesn't mean treatment worked
- Regression to the mean: Many conditions naturally fluctuate
- Coincidence: Recovery happened to coincide with treatment
### 5. Attacking Conventional Medicine
Legitimate alternatives complement conventional care; quackery often demands you choose.
Warning phrases:
- "Conventional medicine is poisoning you"
- "Stop taking your prescribed medications"
- "Doctors only want your money"
Why People Believe
People who use alternative medicine aren't anti-science[7].
Common justifications for using alternative medicine[8]:
- Conventional treatment didn't work
- Desire for more attention and care
- Wanting to feel in control
- Preference for "natural" approaches
- Cultural or family traditions
These are understandable motivations, even when the chosen solutions don't work.
Specific Quackery to Know
### Homeopathy
Belief in homeopathy correlates with lower trust in science and vaccines[9].
Homeopathyⓘ
Why studies sometimes seem positive:
- Poor study design (no proper blinding)
- Placebo effects (especially for subjective symptoms)
- Publication bias (negative trials not published)
- Regression to the mean
Even in well-designed trials, homeopathy equals placebo[11]
### Acupuncture
More complex than homeopathy—some real effects, but often overstated.
Acupuncture has real effects on sensory perception[12]
The problem: "sham" acupuncture (needles in random places, or non-penetrating needles) often works as well as "real" acupuncture. This suggests the effect may be from:
- Patient expectation (placebo)
- Touch and attention
- Non-specific needle effects
- Not specific meridian/point mechanisms
### "Detox" Products
Your liver and kidneys already detoxify your body. Products claiming to "remove toxins" rarely specify what toxins, how they're measured, or how the product removes them.
If you've been poisoned, you need emergency medicine—not a juice cleanse.
### Supplements Without Evidence
The supplement industry is poorly regulated. Claims like "supports immune function" don't require proof because they avoid claiming to treat disease.
Warning signs:
- Proprietary blends (hiding ingredient amounts)
- Claims to treat multiple unrelated conditions
- Sold only through the manufacturer
- Very high doses of nutrients
How to Evaluate Health Claims
### Ask These Questions
1. What's the evidence? Look for randomized controlled trials, not testimonials
2. Who's making the claim? Financial interest? Credentials?
3. Is it published? In peer-reviewed journals or just press releases?
4. Has it been replicated? One study proves nothing
5. What do experts say? Major medical organizations?
6. What are the risks? Everything has risks—if they claim none, be suspicious
### Red Flag Checklist
- [ ] Claims to cure multiple unrelated conditions
- [ ] Uses testimonials instead of trials
- [ ] Attacks "the establishment"
- [ ] Claims to be "suppressed" or "hidden"
- [ ] Uses sciencey words incorrectly (quantum, energy, toxins)
- [ ] Demands immediate purchase
- [ ] Can't be tested or verified
- [ ] Requires stopping conventional treatment
When Alternative Approaches Help
Not all complementary approaches are quackery:
Likely helpful:
- Exercise (widely proven)
- Mindfulness/meditation (for stress, pain)
- Some massage (for muscle tension)
- Yoga/tai chi (flexibility, balance)
May help, needs more research:
- Some herbal medicines (active ingredients, but variable quality)
- Acupuncture for pain (may be mostly placebo, but placebo helps pain)
No good evidence:
- Homeopathy
- Crystal healing
- Ear candling
- "Detox" cleanses
Talking to Someone Using Quackery
Scientists sometimes come across as dismissive[13]
Do:
- Listen to their concerns
- Acknowledge what conventional medicine has failed to provide
- Ask questions rather than lecture
- Share concern for their wellbeing
Don't:
- Call them stupid
- Dismiss their experience
- Issue ultimatums
- Be condescending
People turn to quackery for reasons. Understanding those reasons matters more than winning arguments.
Protect Yourself
1. Be skeptical of certainty — Real medicine acknowledges uncertainty
2. Check sources — Peer-reviewed research, not blogs or social media
3. Consult professionals — Ask your doctor about any supplement or treatment
4. Watch your wallet — Desperation makes us vulnerable to expensive "cures"
5. If it works, they'd prove it — Effective treatments can demonstrate effectiveness in trials
---
References
- ['Benedetti F', 'Frisaldi E', 'Piedimonte A'] (2015). Different Placebos, Different Mechanisms, Different Outcomes: Lessons for Clinical Trials. PLOS ONE. [DOI]
- ['Evers AWM', 'Colloca L'] (2024). Placebo and nocebo in clinical practice: An online cross-sectional survey of healthcare professionals from European countries on views, practices and training needs. PLOS ONE. [DOI]
- ['Ngai CSB', 'Singh RG'] (2023). Navigating persuasive strategies in online health misinformation: An interview study with older adults on misinformation management. PLOS ONE. [DOI]
- ['Lewith G', 'Stuart B', 'Chalder T', 'Brien S'] (2013). Incommensurable Worldviews? Is Public Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicines Incompatible with Support for Science and Conventional Medicine?. PLOS ONE. [DOI]
- ['Bostrom K', 'Bremander A'] (2018). Justifications for using complementary and alternative medicine reported by persons with musculoskeletal conditions: A narrative literature synthesis. PLOS ONE. [DOI]
- ['Fasce A', 'Adrián-Ventura J'] (2023). Medical decision making beyond evidence: Correlates of belief in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and homeopathy. PLOS ONE. [DOI]
- ['Macías-Cortés EC', 'Llanes-González L', 'Aguilar-Faisal L', 'Asbun-Bojalil J'] (2015). Individualized Homeopathic Treatment and Fluoxetine for Moderate to Severe Depression in Peri- and Postmenopausal Women (HOMDEP-MENOP Study): A Randomized, Double-Dummy, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. PLOS ONE. [DOI]
- ['Li J', 'Zhang J', 'Shang H', 'Xue J', 'Liang J', 'Zhang D'] (2014). Effects of Acupuncture on Sensory Perception: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLOS ONE. [DOI]
- ['Dong C', 'Chen X', 'Wang Y'] (2023). Scientists' deficit perception of the public impedes their behavioral intentions to correct misinformation. PLOS ONE. [DOI]